Proposal from Power Conferences Could Reshape NCAA Governance and Championships

In a potential game-changing move for NCAA governance, the power conferences are considering a proposal that would give them more control over rule-making, policy decisions, and postseason events.

The proposal, a joint effort by the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, and ACC, would allow these conferences to manage postseason championships, including iconic events like the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments. This shift in authority would represent a significant departure from the current structure where the national association oversees such events.

While the proposal is still a work in progress and has not been officially approved, it signals a clear direction from the power conferences. They are seeking to expand their autonomous powers beyond legislative and policy matters to include control over championship events, including determining tournament formats, revenue distribution, and selection committee processes.

If implemented, this proposal would establish a new subdivision within the NCAA framework, a concept that aligns with NCAA President Charlie Baker’s “Project DI” plan announced in December 2023.

While discussions around the proposal are ongoing, SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey emphasized that it is a starting point for conversations as Division I leaders work towards a new governance model. The NCAA Division I Board of Directors has formed a working group, including Sankey, to explore these potential changes.

ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips, a member of the NCAA Board of Governors, stressed the importance of finding a governance structure that suits the modern landscape of college athletics. He acknowledged that more work is needed to refine the proposal and address the evolving needs of the industry.

Despite the proposed changes, leaders from the power conferences have stated that they remain committed to ensuring broad access to postseason events for all conferences. This includes maintaining opportunities for mid-major programs and fair revenue sharing from events like the NCAA basketball tournaments.

The proposal has sparked concerns among some non-power conferences about potential limitations on their opportunities and revenue shares. However, those involved in the discussions have emphasized that the goal is not to diminish the unique fabric of college athletics but to adapt to the changing landscape of the industry.

Uncertain Future for NCAA Governance Changes

The likelihood of the NCAA adopting the power conferences’ proposal remains uncertain. While some view the proposal as a viable solution with significant potential, others believe it faces challenges in garnering full membership support.

In the event that the proposal does not receive consensus approval, there is a possibility that the power conferences could consider withdrawing from the association. However, this scenario presents its own challenges, given the existing 10-year agreement between the power leagues and the NCAA as part of the House settlement.

As discussions around the proposal continue, the annual NCAA convention in Nashville next week will serve as a platform for further debate and deliberation on key legislative matters. The need for a new governance model has become a priority following the settlement of antitrust lawsuits over athlete compensation, signaling a pivotal moment in the future of college athletics.

The proposed changes aim to create a more streamlined and uniform policy structure among the power conferences, reflecting the evolving landscape of college sports. With the traditional NCAA model facing challenges from legal and legislative fronts, the time for structural adaptations is deemed necessary by the proponents of the proposal.

While the road ahead may be complex, the push for change in NCAA governance highlights the ongoing evolution of college athletics and the need to adapt to new realities in the industry.