Gov. Newsom and Democratic Leaders Allocate $50 Million for Legal Costs to Fight Trump Administration
Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic legislative leaders plan to set aside $50 million in state funds to cover legal expenses in battling the Trump administration. The decision follows Newsom’s call for a special session two months ago to address the challenges posed by Trump’s presidency.
The Assembly is looking into a bill that would allocate $25 million for affirmative litigation by the state’s Department of Justice, particularly focusing on areas like environmental policies, abortion access, LGBTQ+ student protections, and more. Additionally, plans are in place to confront potential mass deportations by providing legal aid services related to immigration defense, wage theft, evictions, and workplace protections.
Despite Republican criticism labeling the special session as divisive, Democratic officials are moving forward with their agenda. If approved this week, the budget proposals could be finalized before Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.
Any unspent funds from the allocation will be returned to the state’s general fund, ensuring financial accountability.
During Trump’s first term, California spent over $41 million on lawsuits against his administration, primarily to cover legal fees and related expenses.
Other Stories You Should Know
Newsom Proposes $1 Billion in Wildfire Aid
Gov. Newsom and Democratic leaders also proposed earmarking $1 billion for wildfire relief and recovery in Southern California, responding to ongoing crises that have claimed lives and posed severe financial challenges. The allocation aims to support emergency response, cleanup efforts, and community recovery in the face of devastating wildfires.
The funding is expected to be complemented by federal reimbursements and additional funds from climate bonds to enhance the state’s preparedness for future natural disasters.
Rural Children Face Education Cuts
Federal funding for rural schools in California and across the nation is at risk as a critical program faces expiration. As districts seek support from Congress to renew funding, the impact of potential cuts on education in rural areas, including increased class sizes and job losses, looms large, jeopardizing essential educational programs for children.
Read more here.