Completely different politicians honor the anniversary of the 9/11 assaults in several methods, although it’s in all probability truthful to say Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene took a Sept. 11 step no different member of Congress thought to take. The Each day Beast famous:
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) noticed the twenty second anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist assaults on Monday by operating the concept of states’ secession up the flagpole; one thing that, the final time it occurred, triggered a Civil Conflict.
“If the Biden admin refuses to cease the invasion of cartel led human and drug trafficking into our nation, states ought to contemplate seceding from the union,” the Georgia Republican wrote by way of social media. Greene went on to explain President Joe Biden’s insurance policies as “traitorous.”
If this sounds in any respect acquainted, it’s not your creativeness. In late 2021, Greene briefly referenced “a Nationwide Divorce state of affairs” that appeared to allude to the dissolution of the USA. A couple of 12 months later, the Georgia Republican appeared to foretell a “nationwide divorce” in response to the CDC including Covid pictures to its record of advisable vaccine schedules.
Earlier this 12 months, as some elected officers launched statements recognizing the Presidents’ Day vacation, the right-wing congresswoman revealed a message that steered away from conventional American patriotism. “We want a nationwide divorce,” Greene wrote. “We have to separate by crimson states and blue states and shrink the federal authorities. Everybody I discuss to says this. From the sick and disgusting woke tradition points shoved down our throats to the Democrat’s [sic] traitorous America Final insurance policies, we’re performed.”
That was in February. Yesterday, the general public realized that she apparently hasn’t modified her thoughts.
MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan responded to Greene’s newest missive, writing, “In any regular political world, this may require a number of different prime Republicans to denounce MTG’s remarks. They’d be requested about them continually. It’d be an enormous scandal.”
I believe that is each correct and under-appreciated. All issues thought-about, it’s grow to be simple to shrug in response to Greene’s routine extremism. The GOP congresswoman has now repeatedly raised the specter of formally dividing the USA, reinforcing the impression that that is her real perception: Greene apparently doesn’t need to be a part of the identical nation as People she disagrees with.
However extra attention-grabbing than the Georgia Republican’s radicalism is the query of what her celebration intends to do with this info. Have we reached the purpose in our collective historical past at which members of Congress can espouse such concepts with impunity? Do GOP leaders merely not care about these of their midst selling secession? Or are Republicans just too afraid of their radicalized base to say something vital?
As just lately as July, Home Speaker Kevin McCarthy thought it’d be a good suggestion to have a good time Greene as “probably the greatest” members of the GOP convention, and “one of many strongest legislators” within the Home. The California Republican added on the time, “I assist Marjorie Greene very strongly.”
Two months later, the follow-up query for McCarthy is straightforward: As Greene continues to advertise secession, does the Home speaker nonetheless see her as “probably the greatest” members of his convention?
